Upload your work
Drop in an essay, lab report, or problem set. Pick the subject and add any rubric or context your teacher gave you.
No setup, no waiting on a teacher. Upload, read your feedback, and fix the things that move your grade.
Drop in an essay, lab report, or problem set. Pick the subject and add any rubric or context your teacher gave you.
In under a minute you get an estimated grade plus detailed, actionable feedback mapped onto your document.
Work through the colour-coded notes, fix the things that move your grade, and submit a draft you feel good about.
Every pre-grade comes back colour-coded and annotated, so you can see your strengths and your gaps at a glance and act on them right away.
No floating advice, and no single number pretending to be certain. You get a range, and each comment is pinned to the exact words that earned it.
Fitzgerald uses the green light at the end of Daisy’s dock to represent Gatsby’s unreachable dream1, a symbol that returns at every turning point in the novel. The narrator’s tone shifts here without clear evidence2, moving from sympathy to judgement inside a single paragraph.
Nick calls Gatsby great and then describes a man who paid too high a price for one dream. The reader is asked to accept both readings at once3, but the essay never does the work of reconciling them.
Always a range. A teacher marking this on a Tuesday and on a Thursday would not land on the same number, and neither will we. The range is what we can honestly stand behind — the feedback below is the part worth acting on.
…represent Gatsby's unreachable dream
A clear, arguable thesis that goes beyond summary. Keep this.
…shifts here without clear evidence
Two of your four claims are asserted without a supporting quotation. This is the one to fix first.
…accept both readings at once
Resolving this contradiction is the single highest-value change in the essay.
Real feedback from real pre-grades, on real student work. Not reviews — the product itself.
A clear, arguable thesis that goes beyond summary. The one thing holding it back is that the essay discovers a better argument in paragraph 2 and never promotes it.
Where you quote the text you analyse it well. The gap is consistency — two of your four claims are asserted without a supporting quotation.
Paragraphs are ordered sensibly, but the final one reverses the introduction without acknowledging it. Resolving that contradiction is the single highest-value fix.
Clean, controlled prose with varied sentence length and no recurring grammar issues. A few transitions lean on “however” where the logic already carries the weight.
Your procedure is reproducible, but the control is described only by implication. Name it explicitly so a reader knows what you compared against.
Q5 and Q8 reach the right answer through a sign error that cancels itself out. Worth fixing before a marker who reads the working finds it.
Examples from graded work, shared with permission and with names removed. We show you what the feedback looks like rather than telling you how many people liked it.
No card to start. Cancel anytime. Your first three pre-grades are free.